Thanks Bob …. I missed it because I was teaching church history where quite a few reformers were burnt at the stake 
This is for the benefit of those who missed it :
Anil Netto captured most of the salient points and some of the Q & A in his blow by blow account here. Most of the SMS’es I received were of the opinion that Anwar pawned Shabery. What do you think?
i felt maybe Anwar and Shabery could’ve worked in parallel instead of as adversaries…both smart guys…one big issue.
alwyn – i think the goal was more debate focused plus it makes better TV. And politics thrives on polarities. But you have a point if the “heat” is not on winning and convincing. Throw in a third person then the debate can turn into a conversation.
But that would be for a different context.